United States v. Ciriza-Saenz
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Mario Alberto Ciriza-Saenz has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Ciriza-Saenz has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. FloresCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
3Cited by52 opinions
- Wittmer v. Phillips 66 Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2018
- Matson v. Sanderson Farms, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2019
- Lloyd's Syndicate 457 v. Am. Global Mar. Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2018
- Johnston v. DexelDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2019
- Maxim Crane Works, L.P. v. Zurich Am. Ins. Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2019
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.