Legal Opinion

Schnippel v. City of Piqua (In Re Schnippel)

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided November 20, 1990No. Bankruptcy No. 3-88-03837, Adv. No. 3-90-0171Published

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION ON ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

THOMAS F. WALDRON, Bankruptcy Judge.

This proceeding, which arises under 28 U.S.C. § 1334(b) in a case referred to this court by the Standing Order of Reference entered in this district on July 30, 1984, is determined to be a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) — matters concerning the administration of the estate, and (O) — other proceedings affecting the liquidation of the assets of the estate or the adjustment of the debtor-creditor relationship. The issues for decision are presented by the plaintiff’s Complaint For…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. United States v. Whiting Pools, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Roth Steel Products, and Toledo Steel Tube Company, Cross-Appellants v. Sharon Steel Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
  5. MacArthur Co. v. Johns-Manville Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API