Schnippel v. City of Piqua (In Re Schnippel)
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION ON ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
THOMAS F. WALDRON, Bankruptcy Judge.
This proceeding, which arises under 28 U.S.C. § 1334(b) in a case referred to this court by the Standing Order of Reference entered in this district on July 30, 1984, is determined to be a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) — matters concerning the administration of the estate, and (O) — other proceedings affecting the liquidation of the assets of the estate or the adjustment of the debtor-creditor relationship. The issues for decision are presented by the plaintiff’s Complaint For…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. Whiting Pools, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Roth Steel Products, and Toledo Steel Tube Company, Cross-Appellants v. Sharon Steel Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- MacArthur Co. v. Johns-Manville Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.