Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Lombardo
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided March 24, 1930PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCarroll, J.
The indictment charged that the defendant, “with intent to procure the miscarriage of Stella Bralobreski, did -unlawfully administer and advise and prescribe to her, and did cause to be taken by her, a certain medicine, to wit: pills, a more particular description of which is to the said Jurors unknown.” On October 14, 1929, he pleaded “not guilty.” On November 7 he filed a motion to quash, and also a motion for a bill of particulars. These motions were denied and the defendant excepted. He also made an oral motion that the Commonwealth be ordered to elect upon which of the methods “it will…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WakelinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
- Commonwealth v. KingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Commonwealth v. AndersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
- Commonwealth v. SullivanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
- Commonwealth v. WalshMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Commonwealth v. O'BrienMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Commonwealth v. GiacomazzaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- Commonwealth v. BartoliniMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Commonwealth v. MannosMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- Commonwealth v. CoshnearMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.