Legal Opinion
United States v. Robert Sterling
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 10, 1984No. 82-1640PublishedCited by 66 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TANG, Circuit Judge:
Appellant Robert Sterling was convicted of engaging in a continuing criminal enterprise, travelling interstate in aid of racketeering enterprises, possessing with the intent to distribute marihuana in excess of 1,000 pounds, conspiring to possess and distribute marihuana, and conspiring to import marihuana. Sterling on appeal raises numerous claims of trial error, including the allegation that the district court erred in allowing a government witness’ testimony to stand despite the prosecutor’s noncompliance with the Jencks Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3500. Sterling also argues that…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. PolizziCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Lewis Davis Michel, Robert Joseph Belmares, John Handy Jones, Daniel Stewart Henshaw and Ted Ray HinesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Jesus Losada and Rosalinda LosadaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Edwin Thomas BarrettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Donald Eugene Parker, United States of America v. Nicholas FaitheCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- United States v. Rigoberto Moya-Gomez Celestino Orlando Estevez Amado Raphael Leon Adalberto Herrera and Menelao Orlando EstevezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- United States v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Larry FlyntCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Donaciano Hernandez-EscarsegaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Nile SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.