Legal Opinion
Robert v. Perron
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided January 2, 1930PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWait, J.
The bill in this cause was brought at the same time as that in Robert v. O’Connell, ante, decided this day. The cases were heard together by .the master and by the Superior Court. The facts found by the master with reference to the origin and use of the common passageway in general use between Lyman Street and Ely Street in Holyoke and to prescriptive rights therein are the same, and need not be again set out. The land of the defendant adjoins that of Mrs. O’Connell to the south; but the passageway in actual use lies relatively further to the west thereon, and the encroachment upon the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hawkes v. LackeyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- Danforth v. ChandlerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- Cumberland Corp. v. MetropoulosMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
- Caines v. SawyerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
- Forman v. GadouasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- MacLeod v. DavisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Glazer v. SchwartzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Robinson v. PeroMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- Ferrone v. RossiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- Holmes v. JohnsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.