Kindle v. Dejana
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
FEUERSTEIN, United States District Judge
Plaintiff Michael Brewley (“plaintiff”) was formerly employed by a participating em*10ployer in the Atrium Management Services, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan (the “ESOP”). According to plaintiff1 the participating employers are all owned and/or controlled by defendant Peter Dejana (“Dejana”) and his family. Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”), ¶ 1, DE [72]. Plaintiff alleges that the ESOP’s primary asset was its 100% ownership of the stock of defendant Atrium Management Services, Inc. (“Atrium”). He claims that defendants, who were fiduciaries,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Ortiz v. Fibreboard Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Denney v. Deutsche Bank AGCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bacon v. Bd. of Pensions of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in Am.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019
- Daniel Draney v. Westco Chemicals, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2021
- Kohari v. MetLife Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2025
- The Medical Society of the State of New York v. UnitedHealth Group Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2019