Legal Opinion

People v. Byoune

California Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1966No. Crim. No. 10325PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeek, J.

Defendant Realm Luther Byoune appeals from a judgment of conviction entered after a jury found him guilty of second degree robbery.

There is no question as to the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the judgment. Defendant’s basic contention is that the trial court’s refusal to grant him a continuance for the purpose of obtaining private counsel constituted, in the *346circumstances of this case, a prejudicial abuse of discretion as well as a violation of his constitutional right to the assistance of counsel. Since it appears that this contention is meritorious, it is unnecessary to resolve…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ungar v. SarafiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Chandler v. Warden FretagSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. People v. CrovediCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  4. People v. MorrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. People v. MassieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. People v. CourtsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. People v. HollandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. People v. BradyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. People v. ReavesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API