Legal Opinion

Spirit & Sanzone Distributors Co. v. DeCrescente Distributing Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 7, 2001Published

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in denying that part of defendants’ motion seeking partial summary judgment dismissing the third cause of action. In that cause of action, plaintiff sought to recover damages on the theory that it was an intended third-party beneficiary of a distributorship agreement between defendant DeCrescente Distributing Co., Inc. and a nonparty, Miller Brewing Company. As a matter of law, plaintiff is not an intended beneficiary of that agreement (see generally,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Port Chester Electrical Construction Corp. v. AtlasNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Fourth Ocean Putnam Corp. v. Interstate Wrecking Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Houbigant, Inc. v. ACB Mercantile, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
  4. PICCOLI A/S v. Calvin Klein Jeanswear Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1998
  5. Houbigant, Inc. v. ACB Mercantile, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API