Legal Opinion

Broehl v. Broehl

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1913No. 17,954PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the district court for York county: George E. Corcoran, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtLetton, J.

A motion to dismiss the appeal has been made by the administrator, based upon the contention that the order refusing to set apart to the widow a part of the premises as the family homestead and granting a license to him to *167sell real estate to pay debts of the deceased is not a final order, and that it is not reviewable until after confirmation of a sale based upon such order has been made: In this state orders granting” or refusing such licenses have always been considered as final orders, reviewable by proceedings in error until the change in appellate practice, and by appeal since that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bixby v. JewellNebraska Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Miller v. HannaNebraska Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Poessnecker v. EntenmannNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Martin v. Bond's EstateNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Waldow v. BeemerNebraska Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Western Smelting & Refining Co. v. First National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Levin v. MuserNebraska Supreme Court · 1921
  3. In Re Bingaman's EstateNebraska Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Rehn v. BingamanNebraska Supreme Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API