State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. G. P.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1DissentDeits, P. J.
The majority holds that the trial court erred in concluding that child was within the jurisdiction of the juvenile court. I disagree with the majority’s application of our standard of review and its reading of the evidence. Accordingly, I dissent.
As the majority notes, we review juvenile matters, as we do suits in equity, de novo. ORS 419A.200(5); ORS 19.125(3). After stating that standard, however, the majority describes our review as follows:
“We give deference to the trial court’s credibility findings. State ex rel Juv. Dept. v. Greenwood, 107 Or App 678, 680-81, 813 P2d 58 (1991). The…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In re the Dissolution of the Marriage of McCoyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
- In re the Dissolution of the Marriage of McCoyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
- Seitz v. State Ex Rel. Albina Human Resources Center & the Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
- Adamson v. AdamsonOregon Supreme Court · 1975
- State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. MavesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.