Legal Opinion · Dissent

State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. G. P.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 16, 1994No. 930013J; CA A81113Published

1DissentDeits, P. J.

The majority holds that the trial court erred in concluding that child was within the jurisdiction of the juvenile court. I disagree with the majority’s application of our standard of review and its reading of the evidence. Accordingly, I dissent.

As the majority notes, we review juvenile matters, as we do suits in equity, de novo. ORS 419A.200(5); ORS 19.125(3). After stating that standard, however, the majority describes our review as follows:

“We give deference to the trial court’s credibility findings. State ex rel Juv. Dept. v. Greenwood, 107 Or App 678, 680-81, 813 P2d 58 (1991). The…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In re the Dissolution of the Marriage of McCoyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  2. In re the Dissolution of the Marriage of McCoyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  3. Seitz v. State Ex Rel. Albina Human Resources Center & the Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  4. Adamson v. AdamsonOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  5. State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. MavesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API