Legal Opinion

Coats, Rose, Yale, Ryman & Lee, P.C. v. Navigators Specialty Insurance

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided November 21, 2011No. Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-0642-DPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SIDNEY A. FITZWATER, Chief Judge.

The question presented is whether there is a conflict of interest between an insurance company and its insured that supersedes the insurance company’s contractual right to select counsel to defend the insured in a state-court legal malpractice suit. Concluding that there is no conflict, the court upholds the insurance company’s contractual right to select the insured’s counsel.

I

This is a diversity action brought by plaintiff Coats, Rose, Yale, Ryman & Lee, P.C. (“Coats”), a law firm insured under a professional liability insurance…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, L.L.P. v. National Development & Research Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Northern County Mutual Insurance Co. v. DavalosTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Williams v. American Country InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  4. Housing Auth. of City of Dallas, Tex. v. Northland Ins.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2004
  5. Rx. Com Inc. v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2006

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Partain v. Mid-Continent Specialty Insurance Services, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2012
  2. Coats, Rose, Yale, Ryman & Lee, P.C. v. Navigators Specialty InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API