Coats, Rose, Yale, Ryman & Lee, P.C. v. Navigators Specialty Insurance
District Court, N.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SIDNEY A. FITZWATER, Chief Judge.
The question presented is whether there is a conflict of interest between an insurance company and its insured that supersedes the insurance company’s contractual right to select counsel to defend the insured in a state-court legal malpractice suit. Concluding that there is no conflict, the court upholds the insurance company’s contractual right to select the insured’s counsel.
I
This is a diversity action brought by plaintiff Coats, Rose, Yale, Ryman & Lee, P.C. (“Coats”), a law firm insured under a professional liability insurance…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, L.L.P. v. National Development & Research Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2009
- Northern County Mutual Insurance Co. v. DavalosTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- Williams v. American Country InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
- Housing Auth. of City of Dallas, Tex. v. Northland Ins.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2004
- Rx. Com Inc. v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2006
3Cited by2 opinions
- Partain v. Mid-Continent Specialty Insurance Services, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2012
- Coats, Rose, Yale, Ryman & Lee, P.C. v. Navigators Specialty InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012