Northern County Mutual Insurance Co. v. Davalos
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Phillips
The automobile liability policy in this case obligated the insurer to provide a defense for covered claims and granted the insurer the right to conduct that defense. The insured, however, refused the insurer’s tendered defense because of a disagreement about where the case should be defended. The issue we must decide is whether a disagreement over venue is a sufficient reason for the insurer to lose its right to conduct the defense, while still remaining obligated to pay for it. The court of appeals concluded that it was sufficient, affirming an award of damages against the insurer for breach…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Universe Life Insurance v. GilesTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. GandyTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- Employers Casualty Company v. TilleyTexas Supreme Court · 1973
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. BonnerTexas Supreme Court · 2001
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. TraverTexas Supreme Court · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Lamar Homes, Inc. v. Mid-Continent Casualty Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2007
- In Re Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2006
- Lennar Corp. v. Great American Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2006
- Unauthorized Practice of Law Committee v. American Home Assurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
- Joe Partain v. Mid-Continent Casualty CompaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.