Ragusa v. Chi Yeung Lau
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
119 N.J. 276 (1990)
575 A.2d 8
GASPARE RAGUSA, FRANK RAGUSA, AND MARIE RAGUSA, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
DR. CHI YEUNG LAU, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND JERSEY SHORE MEDICAL CENTER, DEFENDANT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued February 26, 1990.
Decided June 13, 1990.
I. Blakeley Johnstone, III, argued the cause for appellant (Johnstone, Skok, Loughlin & Lane, attorneys, Michael J. Schoppmann, on the brief).
Michael S. Feldman argued the cause for respondents (Ozzard, Wharton, Rizzolo, Klein, Mauro, Savo & Hogan, attorneys, Michael S. Feldman and Arthur D. Fialk, on the brief).
The opinion…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Stein; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Stein.
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Grosso v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Clark v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- State v. MacOnSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
- State v. ButlerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.