Commonwealth v. Groom
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion by
Hoffman, J.:
In 1969 appellant was convicted of rape after a trial by jury. Post-trial motions were filed but later withdrawn upon the advice of counsel. Appellant was then sentenced.
Subsequently, he filed a petition pursuant to the Post Conviction Hearing Act alleging, inter alia, the denial of his right to appeal. After a hearing the court held that appellant had waived his right to appeal because of his voluntary withdrawal of post-trial motions.
I believe that the Commonwealth has not shown that appellant’s withdrawal of post-trial motions was knowing and intelligent.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. CannonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Commonwealth v. GilmerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Commonwealth v. MATCHESONSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- Commonwealth v. CordellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970