Legal Opinion · Dissent

Commonwealth v. Groom

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 30, 1971No. Appeal, No. 124Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

Hoffman, J.:

In 1969 appellant was convicted of rape after a trial by jury. Post-trial motions were filed but later withdrawn upon the advice of counsel. Appellant was then sentenced.

Subsequently, he filed a petition pursuant to the Post Conviction Hearing Act alleging, inter alia, the denial of his right to appeal. After a hearing the court held that appellant had waived his right to appeal because of his voluntary withdrawal of post-trial motions.

I believe that the Commonwealth has not shown that appellant’s withdrawal of post-trial motions was knowing and intelligent.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CannonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. Commonwealth v. GilmerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  3. Commonwealth v. MATCHESONSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  4. Commonwealth v. CordellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API