Osbey v. State
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
JUSTICE FEW :
Robert Osbey pled guilty to criminal charges without counsel. He later applied for post-conviction relief (PCR) on the ground he did not waive his right to counsel. We reverse the denial of his PCR claim because the record does not reflect a valid waiver of Osbey's right to counsel. In particular, the plea court did not ensure Osbey was aware of the dangers of self-representation. We remand to the court of general sessions for a new trial.
I. Facts and Procedural History
The State charged Osbey with two counts of trafficking in cocaine base and one count of possession with intent…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. Ronald J. GoldbergCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Peter R. Fitzpatrick v. Louie L. WainwrightCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hines v. StateCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2021
- Missouri v. WilliamsDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2019
- State v. Shanekia GarvinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2026
- United States v. Oscar Guevara SalamancaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020