Legal Opinion

Osbey v. State

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 6, 2019No. Appellate Case 2017-001038; Opinion 27866PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JUSTICE FEW :

Robert Osbey pled guilty to criminal charges without counsel. He later applied for post-conviction relief (PCR) on the ground he did not waive his right to counsel. We reverse the denial of his PCR claim because the record does not reflect a valid waiver of Osbey's right to counsel. In particular, the plea court did not ensure Osbey was aware of the dangers of self-representation. We remand to the court of general sessions for a new trial.

I. Facts and Procedural History

The State charged Osbey with two counts of trafficking in cocaine base and one count of possession with intent…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. United States v. Ronald J. GoldbergCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  5. Peter R. Fitzpatrick v. Louie L. WainwrightCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hines v. StateCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2021
  2. Missouri v. WilliamsDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2019
  3. State v. Shanekia GarvinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2026
  4. United States v. Oscar Guevara SalamancaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API