Legal Opinion

Bell v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 22, 1916No. 7864PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Conviction of misdeamonor; from Bartow superior court—Judge Fite. August 12, 1916.

1Opinion of the CourtWade, C. J.

1. A brief of evidence is essential to the validity of a motion for a new trial (Civil Code, §§ 6889, 6306; Moxley v. Georgia Ry. &c. Co., 122 Ga. 493 (50 S. E. 339)); and when no brief of evidence appears to have been filed, a bill of exceptions assigning error upon the overruling of a motion for a new trial must be dismissed. Brooks v. Proctor, 111 Ga. 835 (36 S. E. 99). See also Collum v. Brown, 102 Ga. 589 (27 S. E 789) ; Whitaker v. State, 138 Ga. 139, 140 (75 S. E. 254). Such a brief “is an indispensable statutory requisite to a valid motion for a new trial . . even though the verdict…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Georgia Railway & Electric Co. v. HamerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  2. Whitaker v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  3. Moxley v. Georgia Railway & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  4. Thompson v. Simmons & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  5. Brooks v. Proctor & HuddlestonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
  2. Griffin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  3. Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API