Legal Opinion

Coatta v. Antrim Iron Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1930No. Docket No. 160, Calendar No. 34,383PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

Plaintiff, as the widow of George B. Coatta and his sole dependent, seeks compensation from the defendant company, of which deceased was an employee. On review by the department of labor and industry, plaintiff’s claim was disallowed, and she is reviewing by certiorari. The material facts charged are stated in the opinion filed by the department as follows:

“The decedent, George B. Coatta, suffered an accidental injury arising out of and in the course of his employment with the defendant, Antrim Iron Company, of Mancelona, on July 9, 1928. He was employed as a boss in the defendant’s lumber…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Beaty v. Foundation Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Hamilton v. Macey Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Perry v. Woodward Bowling Alley Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Young v. NapierCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API