Legal Opinion
Zurla v. City of Daytona Beach
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 28, 2004No. 5D03-3612PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
876 So.2d 34 (2004)
Daniel E. ZURLA, Appellant,
v.
CITY OF DAYTONA BEACH and City of Port Orange, Appellees.
No. 5D03-3612.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
May 28, 2004.
Rehearing Denied July 6, 2004.
Daniel E. Zurla, Port Orange, pro se.
Robert G. Brown, City Attorney, and Benjamin S. Gross, Assistant City Attorney, of Office of City Attorney for Daytona Beach for Appellee, City of Daytona Beach.
Terrence R. Perkins and Robert F. Stepniak of Smith, Hood, Perkins, Loucks & Stout, P.A., Daytona Beach, for Appellee, City of Port Orange.
PLEUS, J.
Daniel Zurla is unhappy with the policy…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Washington v. GlucksbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Minnesota v. Clover Leaf Creamery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- PGA Tour, Inc. v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Hodel v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Silvio Membreno v. City of HialeahDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- Lucas v. Englewood Community Hosp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
- Accela, Inc. v. Sarasota CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
- Noel v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- Zurla v. City of Daytona Beach, FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2005