Legal Opinion · Dissent

Noel v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 27, 2013No. 4D10-1765Published

1DissentCiklin, J.

I believe fundamental due process rights are compromised when a defendant, without being afforded a hearing to consider •willfulness, is automatically sentenced to a longer term of incarceration based on a failure to pay money. The sentencing structures of DeLuise v. State, 72 So.3d 248 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011) and the instant case violated the defendants’ constitutional due process rights. I therefore must respectfully dissent.

By receding from DeLuise, the majority retroactively condones a plainly unconstitutional practice which this court correctly found to constitute fundamental error less than…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Zinermon v. BurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Bearden v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Poore v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
  5. Del Valle v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2011

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API