Noel v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1DissentCiklin, J.
I believe fundamental due process rights are compromised when a defendant, without being afforded a hearing to consider •willfulness, is automatically sentenced to a longer term of incarceration based on a failure to pay money. The sentencing structures of DeLuise v. State, 72 So.3d 248 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011) and the instant case violated the defendants’ constitutional due process rights. I therefore must respectfully dissent.
By receding from DeLuise, the majority retroactively condones a plainly unconstitutional practice which this court correctly found to constitute fundamental error less than…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Zinermon v. BurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Bearden v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Poore v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
- Del Valle v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2011
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.