Legal Opinion

Sollami v. Eaton

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 21, 2001No. 5 — 99—0789PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Maag

Kathleen Sollami was injured while jumping on a trampoline that was manufactured by ICON Health and Fitness, Inc., a corporation, doing business as Jumpking, Inc., a corporation (Jumpking), and was purchased by and located on property owned by Lawrence Eaton (collectively, defendants). Kathleen Sollami and her father, Phillip Sollami (collectively, plaintiffs), filed a complaint in the circuit court of Williamson County against Jumpking under a theory of strict product liability and against Lawrence Eaton under a theory of premises liability. The circuit court granted a summary judgment in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Purtill v. HessIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Suvada v. White Motor Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Ward v. K Mart Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Espinoza v. Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Bucheleres v. Chicago Park DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sollami v. EatonIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
  2. In Re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether ("MTBE") Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
  3. Sollami v. EatonIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Sollami v. EatonIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Sollami v. EatonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API