Legal Opinion

Sollami v. Eaton

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 21, 2001No. 5 — 99—0789Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

747 N.E.2d 375 (2001)

319 Ill. App.3d 612

254 Ill.Dec. 335

Kathleen M. SOLLAMI, Plaintiff-Appellant (Phillip Sollami, Plaintiff and Counterdefendant-Appellant),

v.

Lawrence EATON, Defendant and Counterplaintiff-Appellee (Icon Health and Fitness, Inc., a corporation, d/b/a Jumpking, Inc., a corporation, Defendant-Appellee).

No. 5-99-0789.

Appellate Court of Illinois, Fifth District.

March 21, 2001.

John Womick, Womick Law Firm, Chtd., Carbondale, for Kathleen M. Sollami and Phillip Sollami.

James B. Bleyer, Bleyer and Bleyer, Marion, for Lawrence Eaton.

Stephen J. Maassen, Alton, for Icon Health and…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Maag; Concurrence.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Purtill v. HessIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Suvada v. White Motor Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Ward v. K Mart Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Espinoza v. Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Bucheleres v. Chicago Park DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API