Legal Opinion
Warth Line, Ltd. v. Merinda Marine Co., Ltd.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 12, 1991No. 91 Civ. 4916 (SWK)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER KRAM, District Judge.
Petitioner Warth Line, Ltd. (the “Charterer”), moves to vacate an arbitration award dated April 15, 1991 (the “Decision and Award”), pursuant to the United States Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. § 10(a)(4), on the grounds that the arbitrators “exceeded their powers, or so imperfectly executed them that a mutual, final and definite award upon the subject matter submitted was not made.” Respondent Merinda Marine Co., Ltd. (the “Owner”), opposes the petition to vacate and seeks confirmation of the Award.
BACKGROUND
In March of 1987, the Owner and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Wilko v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Kulukundis Shipping Co. v. Amtorg Trading Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Jack BobkerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- In the Matter of the Arbitration Between Edward M. Siegel v. The Titan Industrial Corporation and Jerome A. SiegelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Siegel v. Prudential Ins. Co. of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- May Ship Repair Contracting Corp. v. Barge Columbia New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001