Legal Opinion

Harry Howard v. A. Robert Tarr

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided December 30, 1958No. 16019_1Published

1Opinion of the Court

MATTHES, Circuit Judge.

This proceeding, an action for deficiency judgment after foreclosure of mortgage on a promissory note executed by appellant, is a diversity case in which we have jurisdiction because of the amount involved.

Upon application of appellee, who was plaintiff below, the trial court entered summary judgment against appellant for $27,062.09 with interest from November 21, 1955, at the rate of 5'% per annum. The correctness of the court’s action is challenged in this appeal. Under Rule 56, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., a summary judgment may be rendered “if the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Joseph Kennedy v. R. C. Bennett, D/B/A Bennett Lumber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1958
  2. City Trust & Savings Bank v. SchwartzOhio Court of Appeals · 1940
  3. Roof v. National Surety Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1952
  4. Hueter v. BinduchowskiOhio Court of Appeals · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API