City Trust & Savings Bank v. Schwartz
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtNichols, P. J.
In the Common Pleas Court of Mahoning county, The City Trust & Savings Bank, herein referred to as plaintiff, brought its action against Walter J. Schwartz and Mary L. Schwartz, herein referred to as defendants, to recover the unpaid balance due on a promissory note executed and delivered by defendants to The Youngstown State Bank, the latter bank having been subsequently consolidated with the plaintiff bank in accordance with the provisions of Section 710-86, G-eneral Code, the plaintiff, by the terms of the consolidation agreement, becoming the owner and holder of the note and the mortgage…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McFarland v. HuenersOregon Supreme Court · 1920
- Shannon v. Universal Mortgage & Discount Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1927
- Commercial Credit Co. v. BishopOhio Court of Appeals · 1927
- Davlin v. KowalkOhio Court of Appeals · 1935
- Lawrence-Cedarhurst Bank v. Ruth, New York County Courts1937
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hughes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
- Massachusetts Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. HaukOhio Court of Appeals · 1943
- Roof v. National Surety Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1952
- East St. Louis Railway Co. v. GrayAppellate Court of Illinois · 1907
- Harry Howard v. A. Robert TarrCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1958
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.