Legal Opinion

Hines v. Neuner

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1953No. 32160PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinley, J.

This is a personal injury-negligence action. The plaintiff was injured while using a pedestrian crosswalk at the intersection of Fifteenth avenue west and west Dravus street in Seattle, when he stumbled and fell over a tow cable, which was attached to the rear of defendant Neuner’s automobile and to the front of defendant Mylet’s automobile, and was being used at the time to tow the latter’s automobile along Fifteenth avenue west.

A jury rendered a verdict in favor of the defendants. Plaintiff’s motion for a new trial was denied, and judgment was entered, dismissing the action with prejudice.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hennessey v. TaylorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  2. Grubb v. Illinois Terminal Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Scott v. Pacific Power & Light Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Pfisterer v. KeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Smith v. Manning's, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1942

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Stone v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Turner v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Blasick v. City of YakimaWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Cornejo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990
  5. Wardhaugh v. Weisfield's, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1953

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API