Davis Plumbing Co. v. Burns
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1ConcurrenceMoore, Judge
I concur in the result reached by the majority, but I do not agree with the reasoning of that opinion. The issue presented for our review is not whether the Alabama Workers’ Compensation Act, § 25-5-1 et seq., Ala.Code 1975 (“the Act”), grants to an employer the right to select the pharmacy at which an employee obtains his reasonably necessary prescription medication; it is whether the Act grants to an employee the right to obtain reasonably necessary prescription medication at a pharmacy of his or her own choosing.
It may be conceded that the Act does not expressly grant to an employer the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Beasley v. MacDonald Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1971
- State ex rel. Anseth v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Holy Family Catholic School v. BoleyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2002
- Geter v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1956
- Kiracofe v. B E & K Construction Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.