Legal Opinion

Bird v. Borough of Moosic

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 24, 2021No. 3:18-cv-02289Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA HEATHER BIRD, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:18-cv02289 v. (SAPORITO, M.J.) BOROUGH OF MOOSIC, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM The case is assigned to us upon the consent of the parties, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Doc. 17; Doc. 18.) The matter is now before us on a motion for summary judgment by the defendants. (Doc. 78.) This motion is fully briefed and ripe for decision. (Doc. 79; Doc. 80; Doc. 85; Doc. 90; Doc. 95.) I. BACKGROUND The plaintiff, Heather Bird, is a part-time…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API