Railroad v. Bigbee
Tennessee Supreme Court
EROM MONTGOMERY. Appeal ill error from Circuit Court of Montgomery County. A. H. MuNEORD, J.
1Opinion of the CourtWilees, J.
These two separate cases involve the duties of a railroad company to erect and maintain stock gaps and wing fences where the road passes through or by the inclosed lands and fields of another. Bigbee owns a parcel of land lying on both sides of the railroad. On the east side he and the railroad company have erected a fence parallel with the road, and about thirty feet from it, and the space between his fence and the railroad track on this side is a deep ditch or gully, so that it is unfit for cultivation or any other ordinary use.
Bryan owns a parcel lying between Bigbee’s two tracts, coming…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. MansonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
3Cited by2 opinions
- Southern Railway Co. v. ForrestCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1931
- Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. TimmonsTennessee Supreme Court · 1905