Legal Opinion

Scottsdale Insurance v. Subscriptions Plus, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

Decided August 11, 2000No. 99-C-0539-CPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

CRABB, District Judge.

In this civil action for declaratory relief, plaintiff Scottsdale Insurance Company contends that it has no duty to defend or indemnify any of the named defendants for liability resulting from a van crash in which seven young people were killed and several more injured. Now before the court are the following motions. Defendants Monica Forgues and Nancy Ashton seek dismissal of the case for lack of diversity subject matter jurisdiction or, in the alternative, under the doctrine of abstention because a lawsuit involving the same accident and parties is…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Wilton v. Seven Falls Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Newman-Green, Inc. v. Alfonzo-LarrainSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Indianapolis v. Chase Nat. BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. City of Indianapolis v. Chase National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ravenswood Investment Co. v. Avalon Correctional ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  2. Cassens v. CassensDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2006
  3. In re Chinese Manufactured Drywall Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2011
  4. CFI of Wisconsin, Inc. v. Hartford Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2005
  5. Bad River Band of the Lake Superior Tribe of Chippewa Indians of the Bad River Reservation v. Enbridge Energy Company, Inc.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API