Black Hills Trust & Sav. Bank v. Stenger
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRudolph, J.
This appeal involves three separate actions upon three promissory notes. The defendant Stenger was a signer of all three notes and served with process in all three actions. The defendant Sohn was a signer upon one' note and served with process in the action upon that note. The other defendants were not served with process. All of the defendants were stockholders or directors of the Osage-Upton Oil Company, of which one Bert Rogers was secretary and treasurer. Bert Rogers was also cashier of the plaintiff, Black Hills Trust & Savings Bank. The pleadings and the evidence relating to the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Stebbins v. LardnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1891
- Thompson v. McKeeSupreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota · 1888
- First State Bank of Lemmon v. McMahonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1921
3Cited by2 opinions
- Smith v. Federal Surety Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
- Citizens State Bank v. RosenwaldSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934