Legal Opinion
National Audubon Society v. Department of the Navy
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided September 7, 2005No. 05-1405PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed in part; vacated and remanded with instructions in part by published opinion. Judge WILKINSON wrote the opinion, in which Judge WILLIAMS and Judge TRAXLER joined.
OPINION
WILKINSON, Circuit Judge.
In this case we consider whether the Department of the Navy has complied *181with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), 42 U.S.C. § 4321 et seq. (2000), in its decision to construct a landing field for its new Super Hornet aircraft in Washington and Beaufort Counties, North Carolina. The landing field would lie within five miles of the Pocosin Lakes National Wildlife Refuge, the winter…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Amoco Production Co. v. Village of GambellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Weinberger v. Romero-BarceloSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Hecht Co. v. BowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Forest Guardians v. United States Fish & Wildlife ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- National Audubon Society v. Department Of The NavyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
- Christopher Miller v. West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources (DHHR), Preston County Circuit Court, Judge [Name Unknown], Attorney Chris Wilson, Deandra Burton, Guardian Ad Litem, Attorney Richard GutmanDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2026
- in Re Ricardo Fornesa, Cynthia Fornesa, Judy Thanh Fornesa, and Mark Anthony FornesaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2018