Legal Opinion

Doe v. Piper

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided February 25, 2016No. Civil No. 15-2639 (JRT/SER)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS

JOHN R. TUNHEIM, Chief Judge, United States District Court

This case is about the validity of the Minnesota Indian Family Preservation Act (“MIFPA”), a law enacted by the Minnesota State Legislature for the purpose of addressing historic wrongs to American Indian (“Indian”) tribes and families. Plaintiffs Jane and John Doe are themselves Indian, but they view the statute as an infringement on their rights to equal protection and due process. The Does are not the first to challenge a statute like this one, but their complaint is…

2Cases cited64 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Building Owners and Managers Association of Chicago v. The City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021
  2. Cade v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
  3. M.B. v. TidballDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API