Stephens v. Simpson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Submission of a controversy upon an agreed statement of facts, pursuant to section 1279 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
1Opinion of the Court
McLaughlin, J.:
This case comes before the court upon an agreed statement of facts. (Code Civ. Proc. § 1279.) The plaintiff’s testator, George W. Stephens, at five different times commencing on the 8th of June, 1900, and ending on the 30th of November, 1901, pawned with the defendants, duly licensed pawnbrokers doing business in the city of New York, five pieces of jewelry, for which five pawn tickets were issued, numbered, respectively, 3,032, 18,190, 33,595, 35,316 and 37,369. Stephens failed to redeem any of the articles, and upon sales had, after deducting the amount loaned, together with…
2Cited by6 opinions
- People ex rel. Broderick v. GoldfogleNew York Supreme Court · 1924
- In re the Estate of AdamsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
- Kirsch v. Provident Loan SocietyAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1947
- Bernstein v. WeinsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
- Harder v. ClarkCity of New York Municipal Court · 1910
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.