Legal Opinion
Horwath v. Local Agency Formation Commission
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 20, 1983No. AO22031PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ELKINGTON, Acting P. J.
The clerk of the County of San Mateo has called an election to be held Tuesday, June 7,1983, for the purpose of determining (1) *179whether a city of East Palo Alto shall be organized, and (2) whether two public entity districts wholly within its proposed boundaries shall be dissolved, with their facilities reorganized as part of the proposed city.
The election has been called pursuant to the “District Reorganization Act of 1965,” found in Government Code section 56000 et seq. (hereafter DRA). DRA, among other things, provides for the reorganization of public…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Temescal Water Co. v. Department of Public WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Southern California Jockey Club, Inc. v. California Horse Racing BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- City of Ceres v. City of ModestoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- City of Santa Cruz v. Local Agency Formation CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Realty Projects, Inc. v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- San Miguel Consolidated Fire Protection District v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- SBAM PARTNERS, LLC v. Cheng Miin WangCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Horwath v. Local Agency Formation CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Untitled California Attorney General Opinion, California Attorney General Reports1994