Legal Opinion

Imperial Massage & Health Studio, Inc. v. Lee

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 29, 1973No. 28386PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nichols, Justice.

The District Attorney of the Houston Judicial Circuit filed an action against the appellants to abate a nuisance alleged to be existing in violation of Code Chapter 72-3. Thereafter an order was entered by consent of the parties which ordered the practices alleged to be a nuisance to cease, but which permitted the appellants’ business to otherwise operate. Still later the appellants obtained other attorneys to represent them and the present appeal was filed. Enumerated as error is the consent judgment and the permitting of extensive pre-trial publicity which had the effect of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hart v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1971
  2. Bennett v. BennettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1954
  3. Sharpe v. PughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. Don v. DonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  5. Durham v. SpenceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Carnett's, Inc. v. HammondSupreme Court of Georgia · 2005
  2. Friedman v. FriedmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
  3. Graham Brothers' Construction Co. v. C. W. Matthews Contracting Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  4. Rieffel v. RieffelSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
  5. Cormier v. CormierSupreme Court of Georgia · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API