Russell v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
WHITE, Judge.
On April 23, 1987, appellant was adjudged guilty of aggravated robbery and sentenced to a ninety-nine year term in the state penitentiary after the sentencing jury had found an enhancement allegation to be “true.”
On direct appeal, the Court of Appeals held, inter alia, that the State had failed to prove the finality of the conviction used to enhance appellant’s punishment. Russell v. State, 744 S.W.2d 699 (Tex.App.—Eastland 1988). The court then proceeded to apply a harmless error analysis to this failure of proof, and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Diremiggio v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Carter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Scott v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
- McGinnis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Parrott, Ex Parte Jimmie Mark Jr.Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2013
- Pettigrew v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
- Meineke v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
- Hood v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Jamie Lee Bledsoe v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2015
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.