Thurman v. Cundiff
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Rees, J.:
This is an action for false arrest. A jury verdict in favor of plaintiff was returned in the amount of $25,000 for compensatory damages. The trial court reduced the award by $10,000 and entered judgment for $15,000. Both sides appeal.
1. Defendants first contend the trial court erred in failing to grant them a directed verdict. They argue there was no evidence that either of them directed, requested, commanded or otherwise caused the plaintiff’s arrest. We disagree.
On review of a ruling on a motion for a directed verdict, this court is governed by the same standards applicable to the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Dimick v. SchiedtSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Kennon v. GilmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Ford v. Guarantee Abstract & Title Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1976
- Wiley v. KeokukSupreme Court of Kansas · 1870
- Highland Lumber Co., Inc. v. KnudsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Samsel v. Wheeler Transport Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1990
- Sampson v. HuntSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
- Henderson v. HassurSupreme Court of Kansas · 1979
- Occhino v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- Debra St. John v. United States of America, Acting Through the Bureau of Indian AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.