Legal Opinion

Thurman v. Cundiff

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided June 30, 1978No. 49,038PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rees, J.:

This is an action for false arrest. A jury verdict in favor of plaintiff was returned in the amount of $25,000 for compensatory damages. The trial court reduced the award by $10,000 and entered judgment for $15,000. Both sides appeal.

1. Defendants first contend the trial court erred in failing to grant them a directed verdict. They argue there was no evidence that either of them directed, requested, commanded or otherwise caused the plaintiff’s arrest. We disagree.

On review of a ruling on a motion for a directed verdict, this court is governed by the same standards applicable to the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Dimick v. SchiedtSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Kennon v. GilmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Ford v. Guarantee Abstract & Title Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  4. Wiley v. KeokukSupreme Court of Kansas · 1870
  5. Highland Lumber Co., Inc. v. KnudsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Samsel v. Wheeler Transport Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1990
  2. Sampson v. HuntSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  3. Henderson v. HassurSupreme Court of Kansas · 1979
  4. Occhino v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
  5. Debra St. John v. United States of America, Acting Through the Bureau of Indian AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API