Legal Opinion

Texaco Refining & Marketing, Inc. v. Sanderson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 20, 1987No. 09 87 075 CVPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BROOKSHIRE, Justice.

The Relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. Lavergne and his counsellors sought to obtain certain alleged investigative materials and the results of a certain investigation or investigations. The Relator claimed that these matters were not subject to discovery. The trial judge held a hearing on the same and viewed, in camera, the materials.

After the hearing and the examination of the alleged investigative materials, and after considering briefs, the trial judge entered an order granting a motion to compel production of all statements and other materials taken…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Jampole v. TouchyTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  3. West v. SolitoTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Garcia v. PeeplesTexas Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Allen v. HumphreysTexas Supreme Court · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Enterprise Products Co. v. Sanderson, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1988
  2. American Home Assurance Co. v. Cooper, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1990
  3. American Home Assurance Co. v. Cooper, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1990
  4. Enterprise Products Co. v. Sanderson, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1988
  5. National Tank Co. v. BrothertonTexas Supreme Court · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API