Legal Opinion

Melinder v. United States

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided February 21, 1968No. Civ. 66-329PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

DAUGHERTY, District Judge.

This action for refund of fraud penalties assessed and paid was brought by the widow of Roy J. Melinder, M. D. m her individual capacity and as Executrix of the Estate of Dr. Melinder. The Plaintiffs will hereinafter be referred to as “Taxpayer” and the Defendant as “Government.” The Taxpayer objected to certain evidence offered at trial, and these objections will be disposed of before proceeding to the merits.

The Taxpayer has objected to testimony of two Government witnesses, Internal Revenue Agents Rausch and Nathman, relative to admissions made…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Spies v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Palmer v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Bull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Mitchell v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. Hancho C. KimCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
  2. United States v. Joseph RussoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
  3. Wheatland Irrigation District v. McGuireWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  4. United States v. St. MaryDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1971
  5. Moulder v. City Investing Co. Liquidating Trust (In re National Trust Group, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API