Legal Opinion

Cabe v. Halverson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1956No. 33299PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonworth, J.

This is an action brought to establish a boundary line and to recover treble damages from an alleged trespasser for cutting and destroying standing timber.

The material facts in this case are not in dispute. Government lots 8 and 9 (each less than 40 acres) in section 24, township 17 north, range 6 west, W. M., Grays Harbor county, correspond in location to a southeast quarter of a northeast quarter and a northeast quarter of a southeast quarter, respectively. The line between these two lots thus corresponds generally to an east-west center line of a section.

In 1922, defendant husband…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Taylor v. TalmadgeWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Niven v. SheehanWashington Supreme Court · 1955

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Chaplin v. SandersWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Magelssen v. CoxWashington Supreme Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API