Legal Opinion · Dissent
Interlake, Inc. v. Kansas Power & Light Co.
Court of Appeals of Kansas
Decided December 10, 1981No. 52,481Published
1DissentAbbott, J.
This case involves the corporate owner of a pipeline easement (KPL) which purchased pipe from a retail supplier (Continental) which in turn obtained the pipe from its supplier (Interlake). In my opinion, this case involves the supplier of a supplier and not the supplier of a contractor or subcontractor.
KPL intended to and did subsequently construct a pipeline in Kansas. In preparation, it ordered the pipe involved in this case from Continental, issuing its verbal order for pipe on April 22, 1976. Continental issued a written order and shipping instructions to Interlake on the same day for…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- American Buildings Co. v. Wheelers StoresWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
- Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Dan Austin Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Stewart v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
- City of Evansville v. Verplank Concrete & Supply, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1980
- Ronald A. Coco, Inc. v. St. Paul's Methodist ChurchNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.