Daniels v. Amazon

FOINR T THHEE U SNOIUTTEHDE SRTNA TDEISST DRIISCTTR OICFT G CEOOURRGTIA AUGUSTA DIVISION MARQUAVIOUS DANIELS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) CV 124-197 ) AMAZON and ATTORNEY ADIAN ) MILLER, ) ) Defendants. ) MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis (“IFP”) in the above-captioned case. Because he is proceeding IFP, Plaintiff’s amended complaint must be screened to protect potential defendants. Phillips v. Mashburn,

746 F.2d 782, 785

(11th Cir. 1984). On November 4, 2024, the Court denied Plaintiff’s motion to proceed IFP without prejudice and…