Legal Opinion

Wenom v. Fossick

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1904PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Writ oE Error to the Appellate Court for the Fourth District;—heard in that court on writ of error to the Circuit Court of Madison county; the Hon. B. R. Burroughs, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scott

On March 27, 1903, defendants in error recovered a judgment against plaintiff in error in the circuit court of Madison county for costs of suit. For the purpose of having that judgment reviewed, plaintiff in error sued out a writ of error from the Appellate Court for the Fourth District. That court dismissed the writ, assigning as a reason therefor, that the judgment in question was not a final judgment, and the cause comes to this court upon a writ of error.

^izzie Wenom, the plaintiff in error, brought suit against Henry Fossick and Julius Rosenberg, defendants in error, in trespass. 'Her…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ward v. StoutIllinois Supreme Court · 1863
  2. Scott v. BurtonTexas Supreme Court · 1851
  3. Zimmerman v. ZimmermanIllinois Supreme Court · 1853

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Chicago Portrait Co. v. Chicago Crayon Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Impey v. City of WheatonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
  3. Aetna Plywood & Veneer Co. v. RobineauAppellate Court of Illinois · 1949
  4. People ex rel. Hesterman v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
  5. People ex rel. Ring v. Board of EducationIllinois Supreme Court · 1908

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API