Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ofstad v. South Dakota Department of Transportation

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1986No. 14720Published

1DissentSabers, Justice

I dissent.

SDCL 62-4-33 controls this case because it controls claims of employees of the highway department and the payment of such claims from department funds. § 62-4-33 provides in part that ... [the state highway department] ... shall pay such claims from funds available for the maintenance of [the] department, or may procure insurance as provided in §§ 62-5-2 to 62-5-4, inclusive. (Emphasis added)

SDCL §§ 62-5-2 to 62-5-4 inclusive, pertain to worker’s compensation insurance. Obviously, “such claims” include workmen’s compensation claims.

This court has held that the attorney fees statute,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Skelly Oil Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Chalmers v. OREGON AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANYOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  3. All Ways Reliable Building Maintenance, Inc. v. MooreSupreme Court of Florida · 1972
  4. All Nation Insurance Co. v. BrownSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  5. All Nation Insurance Co. v. BrownSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API