Legal Opinion

United States v. DeNoyer

Army Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided May 29, 1996No. Army 9500422Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

CARROLL, Judge:

Appellant was tried before a general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members. Pursuant to his pleas he was found guilty of indecent assault, indecent language, and solicitation to commit adultery in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934 (1988) [hereinafter UCMJ]. He was also convicted, contrary to his pleas, of two additional specifications of indecent assault and two other specifications of indecent language. The approved sentence consisted of a dishonorable discharge, confinement for one year, forfeiture…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. LovingCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1994
  2. United States v. BlockerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
  3. United States v. ParkerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
  4. Barnett Bank of Marion County, N. A. v. GallagherSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. United States v. EberhardtU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API