Legal Opinion

Feldman v. Target Corporation

District Court, M.D. Florida

Decided June 17, 2021No. 3:19-cv-00419Unknown

1Opinion

United States District Court Middle District of Florida Jacksonville Division BARBARA FELDMAN, Plaintiff, v. No. 3:19-cv-419-PDB TARGET CORPORATION, Defendant. Omnibus Order Barbara Feldman alleges that, while shopping at Target, she tripped over a corner guard, fell, and injured herself. At a trial beginning on June 22, 2021, a jury must decide her claim that Target breached a duty to maintain the store in a reasonably safe condition. The Court earlier granted summary judgment on her claim that Target breached a duty to warn, ruling the corner guard is open and obvious. Doc. 79 at 9, 11;…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Luce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Roderic R. McDowell v. Pernell BrownCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
  5. Sprint/United Management Co. v. MendelsohnSupreme Court of the United States · 2008

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API