Dinet v. Rapid City
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the District of South Dakota; James D. Elliott, Judge. Action by Henry G. Dinet against the City of Rapid City, S. D. There was a judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
CARLAND, Circuit Judge.
This action was brought by plaintiff in error to recover the principal and interest due upon 70 bonds of defendant in error, for $1,000 each, dated May 1, 1891, claiming to be the owner and holder thereof for value before maturity without notice of any fact affecting their validity. The answer of defendant in error,, in addition to a general denial, pleaded two other defenses: first. That the bonds were in excess of the constitutional limit of indebtedness of defendant in error. Second. That although the bonds on their-face purported to have been issued for the purpose…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Comins v. ScrivenerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
- Een v. Consolidated FreightwaysCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1955
- Glendenning Motorways, Inc. v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1954
- Harnik v. LilleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1948
- Sylvia v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1920
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.