Legal Opinion

Pearson v. T. Rockhill & Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 31, 1843PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the Louisville Chancery Court. Fraudulent conveyances. Trustees and Trusts.

1Opinion of the Court

Judge Marshall

delivered th.e opinionvof tlie Coutt.

This is an appeal from a decree rendered in four consolidated suits, (one of which has been compromised,) whereby a deed of trust from Pearson & Anderson to J. Anderson, J. Marshall and E. M. Taylor, dated 25th of September, 1838, was set aside as fraudulent and void against creditors, and the Trustees, jointly, with Pearson & Anderson, the debtors, were decreed to pay to the creditors who assailed the deed, the full amount of their debts, making a sum in the aggregate exceeding $10,000.

Without’stopping to inquire what circumstances might or…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Vernon & Averill v. Morton & SmithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1839
  2. Byrd v. BradleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1842

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Burrows v. LehndorffSupreme Court of Iowa · 1859
  2. Smith v. JonesNebraska Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Hathaway v. RoachU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1846
  4. Leitensdorfer v. WebbNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1853

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API