Legal Opinion
Emiliano v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
Decided October 29, 1992No. 13-91-411-CRPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FEDERICO G. HINOJOSA, Jr., Justice.
A jury convicted appellant, who was certified to stand trial as an adult, for murder and assessed punishment at life in prison and a $10,000.00 fine. By three points of error, appellant complains that the trial court erred in allowing a witness to testify after that witness heard the testimony of another witness and in admitting evidence illegally seized. Appellant also challenges the sufficiency of the evidence. We affirm the trial court’s judgment.
John Emiliano and Jimmy Tejeda went into a Circle K convenience store in Victoria, Texas, shortly after…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Horton v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Mestiza v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1996
- Moss v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1994
- Davila v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Damon Lawrence Chapman v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2005
- Damon Lawrence Chapman v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.