Legal Opinion

Fence Creek Cattle Co. v. United States Forest Service

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 26, 2010No. 08-36051PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TALLMAN, Circuit Judge:

The issue in this case boils down to a simple question: Where’s the beef? Plaintiff-Appellant Fence Creek Cattle Company (“Fence Creek”) claimed that it had purchased over 1,500 head of cattle from the former owner, which it wished to continue grazing on federal land. But, when questioned by the United States Forest Service (“Forest Service”), Fence Creek could not sufficiently prove that it owned the cattle. Consequently, the Forest Service cancelled portions of Fence Creek’s livestock grazing permit.

The Forest Service issued a term grazing permit to Fence Creek on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Arizona Cattle Growers' Ass'n v. United States Fish & WildlifeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  3. The Lands Council v. PowellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  4. Gebhart v. Securities & Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water v. Natural Resources Defense CounCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  2. San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water v. Pacific Coast Federation Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  3. Albert Alto v. Kenneth SalazarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  4. Bingham v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  5. Bear Valley Mutual Water Co. v. Kenneth SalazarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API